Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

3,227 Excellent

1 Follower

About Snakehips

Your Profile

  • Location
    Leafy Warwickshire

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. For us, the Osmio Zero has proved a great success. Our electric kettle has spent the last 5 months sitting in a cupboard, unused. FWIW... I happily use unaltered Osmio water in the LR
  2. Waffle! But who gives a toss?
  3. Sorry, I can't comment on that until we've done a full whisk assessment.
  4. Plus 1 ! I call them end of bag mongrel shots and they rarely disappoint.
  5. 1. AmandaH 2. Bainbridge 3. Abs 4. MildredM  5. fluffles 6. Nick1881 7. EricC 8. Junglebert  9. Rakesh  10. Snakehips
  6. I'm sure you are probably right. I just recall the noticeable difference between ambient and the contained internal temperature when you first remove the side panel. Also, a drop in the static pressure readings, of 1.5 bar, as it cooled to ambient. Probably of no consequence whatsoever, certainly not in my coffee world. Go for it! Replacement panels are available!
  7. @Fez In addition to removing the righthand location pin from the top panel, you will benefit from easing the top and bottom clips that secure the side panel. Do this by using a screwdriver, or the like, to splay, apart, the two springs. I do this with all of the panel fixings as a matter of course and it makes panel removal somewhat easier. If you overdo it then just pinch the spring back in a little. I have played with varying PI and can say that it definitely has an impact on extraction. However, removing the side panel and having to contort in order to read and adjust the display is something I would prefer not to be part of my normal coffee-making routine. I’m sure it’s marginal, if at all significant, but I have wondered if settings you establish after a session with the panels off reflect 100% same once the machine is fully clad? I too read somewhere of someone who proposed to cut an aperture in the side panel in order to access the module but have heard nothing further. I can imagine how they might make a good job of that and, if nimble-fingered, rubber-necked and have 20:20 vision then great. I can also imagine how they might make a bit of a pig's ear of it and be looking to buy a replacement side panel. Anyway, for some time now I have been, pretty much, happy to stick to the middle of the road and use a setting of 3.1bar. I look forward to the arrival of the App and the convenience that will hopefully bring.
  8. Yes! If ever we needed a laugh....... it's now.
  9. @MildredM. Bottom right.... NB: While it marks the site as read, it does not immediately refresh the page. If I want it cleared I click on my Unread Topics button and that does it.
  10. I have a three-edged ‘Levelling’ tool that looks very similar to the one @DavecUK has. I did manage to read Dave’s review before he pulled it, and, once I got over the shock of him having splashed out £3.85, or whatever it was, on a coffee gadget, I too was surprised to read that he was rotating it, only, clockwise. The only basis for that surprise was me comparing it to the way I used to use mine. I say used to use it, as it has been confined to a cupboard since I acquired, initially, a LevTamp and then, subsequently, a PUQpress. Truth is, I don’t think I ever gave the process a great deal of thought. Rather, from the get-go, it seemed intuitive to rotate the leveller anti-clockwise for a few turns…..thinking that the sharper edges would more readily collect, push, level and, evenly distribute grinds. Then rotate a few clockwise turns….. to finesse the puck surface prior to conventional tamping. However, as Dave has pointed out, there is an almost inevitable issue with anticlockwise turning. Dependant upon coffee / grind and, probably, atmospheric conditions, a small amount of coffee can collect behind the three steep edges. This either remains as a small, loose, deposit on the otherwise flat puck or, it sticks to the tool itself. Anyway, this thread prompted me to get the tool out of the cupboard and take a look at what it actually achieves. The idea was to try and observe the mechanics of the process and so did not involve using the resultant pucks to make espresso. There is no way that my methods can claim to be scientific but I did try to make them semi-sensible and, for what they are worth, my observations objective. The tool is intended to be rotated with it’s shoulder running on the basket rim and so, needs to be set to a suitable depth. The centre of the base and the three radials are nominally flat and equate to about 50% surface area. The other 50% is made up of the three sections which cut back 3mm and slow taper to nothing. Immediately you drop the tool down onto the coffee bed, 50% of the puck is ’tamped’ nominally flat, to the fixed depth. If you rotate anti-clockwise, a small amount of grinds gets swept by the sharp shoulder. This either ends up left on top of the puck or stuck to the tool. It rarely if ever becomes integral with the puck. The amount of coffee wasted if it sticks to the tool is insignificant. The amount of coffee that may be loosely deposited on the otherwise flat puck is insignificant if later tamped. If you rotate clockwise, the coffee that, initially, takes up the space of the slow tapers, gets compressed and flattened. IMO it does NOT get moved or distributed around the puck. The puck surface will be flat and smooth. It’s a great basis to aid getting a level, subsequent, manual tamp. There are three sections to this tool. By the time it has been rotated little more than 120º, a third of a turn, it has done as much work as it is going to do! Unless set too deeply, the compaction density of the puck will be limited by the shoulder setting. Any significant unevenness in the initial bed of grounds will be reflected by uneven density of areas within the puck. In summary, it provides a quick way to level the surface of a puck. I don’t believe it significantly improves the distribution of the coffee grounds. The consistency of density throughout the resultant puck is a factor of preparation, such as stirring and or shaking down, done prior to its use. I’m not suggesting that it’s an espresso prep killer but, is it particularly beneficial over a fixed depth tamper? There are similar tools, such as the OCD, which has four somewhat deeper segments, that may do a far better job than I believe mine does.
  11. Magnum Almond ! 😊
  • Create New...